As a chief operating
officer of a hospital, you have been tasked with opening a new ambulatory care
center in your city.
Write a 2-3 page
paper in which you:
- Specify whether you
would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market
perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Debate
at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen
perspective. Provide at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to
support your response. - Analyze the key
components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source
could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new
initiative. - Use at least two (2)
quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not
qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must
follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double
spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all
sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check
with your professor for any additional instructions. - Include a cover page
containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s
name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are
not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course
learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Describe the
evolution of hospitals and sources of law. - Examine tort law and
the criminal aspects of health care. - Use technology and
information resources to research issues in healthcare policy, law, and
ethics. - Write clearly and
concisely about healthcare policy and law using proper writing
mechanics.
Click here to view the grading rubric.
| Points: 150 |
Assignment 1: Health Policy and Law Basics |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable |
Meets Minimum Expectations |
Fair |
Proficient |
Exemplary |
|
1. Specify whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Debate at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Provide at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response. |
Did not submit or incompletely specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Did not submit or incompletely debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Did not submit or incompletely provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response. |
Insufficiently specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Insufficiently debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Insufficiently provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response. |
Partially specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Partially debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Partially provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response. |
Satisfactorily specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Satisfactorily debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Satisfactorily provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response. |
Thoroughly specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Thoroughly debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Thoroughly provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response. |
|
2. Analyze the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative. |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative. |
Insufficiently analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative. |
Partially analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative. |
Satisfactorily analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative. |
Thoroughly analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative. |
|
3. Two (2) References |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Opening a new ambulatory care center is a significant task, and it requires a proper understanding of the structure and legal aspects associated with it. In this paper, we will discuss the perspectives to design the structure of the new center and the key components of sources of law that could impact the healthcare organization’s new initiative.
1. Which perspective should be used to design the new center structure, and what are their advantages and disadvantages?
The professional autonomy perspective should be utilized to design the structure of the new center. It emphasizes individual decision making, and healthcare professionals have considerable control in their field. This perspective can result in better quality care and more efficient operations. Additionally, healthcare professionals are given greater control to provide individualized treatments that best suit their patient’s needs. However, this approach can be expensive and less cost-effective than other approaches. Moreover, healthcare professionals may face challenges when communicating within a team that is not supportive of their individualism. Despite its potential drawbacks, professional autonomy may still be useful in certain cases, such as when a patient has a complex or critical medical condition that requires tailored treatment. Two examples of this perspective are cancer treatment and palliative care.
2. What are the key components of sources of law that could impact the healthcare organization’s new initiative?
Three sources of law could potentially impact the healthcare organization’s new initiative – administrative law, tort law, and contract law. Administrative law includes the laws and regulations that govern healthcare facilities’ licensing, inspection, and accreditation. Tort law includes civil lawsuits and damages that arise due to medical malpractice, negligence, or intentional harm. Breach of contract claims may arise due to disputes or violations of contracts with healthcare providers, insurance companies, or patients. The key components of these sources of law include contractual obligations, liability for damages, regulatory compliance, sources of authority, and ethical codes of conduct. The healthcare organization should ensure that it complies with all licensing requirements and regulations, maintains proper documentation and communication systems, and provides adequate training to its staff to avoid potential claims of malpractice or negligence. By analyzing and understanding these aspects, the healthcare organization can safeguard itself from legal challenges and create a positive working environment that supports its new initiative.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, choosing the proper perspective to design the structure of the new center and understanding the key components of the sources of law is essential in ensuring a successful healthcare organization. By utilizing the professional autonomy perspective and complying with administrative, tort, and contract law, the healthcare organization can make informed decisions that benefit patients, staff, and stakeholders.
